Re: pg_restore -t should match views, matviews, and foreign tables - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: pg_restore -t should match views, matviews, and foreign tables
Date
Msg-id 55243BBB.4040208@gmx.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to pg_restore -t should match views, matviews, and foreign tables  (Craig Ringer <craig@2ndquadrant.com>)
Responses Re: pg_restore -t should match views, matviews, and foreign tables
List pgsql-hackers
On 3/31/15 11:01 PM, Craig Ringer wrote:
> Following on from this -bugs post:
> 
> http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAMsr+YGJ50TvTVK4Dbp66gAjeOC0KaP6KXFEHAOM+neQmHvoQA@mail.gmail.com
> 
> this patch adds support for views, foreign tables, and materialised
> views to the pg_restore -t flag.

I think this is a good change.  Any concerns?





pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Geoghegan
Date:
Subject: Re: Row security violation error is misleading
Next
From: Kevin Grittner
Date:
Subject: Re: Parallel Seq Scan