Re: "rejected" vs "returned with feedback" in new CF app - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: "rejected" vs "returned with feedback" in new CF app
Date
Msg-id 55243183.70200@gmx.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to "rejected" vs "returned with feedback" in new CF app  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: "rejected" vs "returned with feedback" in new CF app
List pgsql-hackers
On 4/7/15 3:33 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> I tried to mark the "UPDATE SET (*)" patch as "returned with feedback",
> but the CF app informed me that if I did that the patch would
> automatically be moved to the next commitfest.  That seems completely
> stupid.  There is no need to reconsider it unless a new version of the
> patch is forthcoming (which there may or may not ever be, but that's
> beside the point for now).  When and if the author does submit a new
> patch, that would be the time to include it in the next commitfest, no?

I noticed that as well and have avoided closing some patches because of it.




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: "rejected" vs "returned with feedback" in new CF app
Next
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: Auditing extension for PostgreSQL (Take 2)