Re: Exposing PG_VERSION_NUM in pg_config - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: Exposing PG_VERSION_NUM in pg_config
Date
Msg-id 5519B486.5010001@gmx.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Exposing PG_VERSION_NUM in pg_config  (Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Exposing PG_VERSION_NUM in pg_config  (Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 3/25/15 1:32 AM, Michael Paquier wrote:
> Well, I have no other cases than ones of the type mentioned upthread,
> and honestly I am fine as long as we do not apply maths to a version
> string. So attached is a patch that adds VERSION_NUM in
> Makefile.global.

How would you make use of this in an extension makefile?




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Pavel Stehule
Date:
Subject: Re: proposal: searching in array function - array_position
Next
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: Ignoring entries generated by autoconf in code tree