Re: INT64_MIN and _MAX - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Petr Jelinek
Subject Re: INT64_MIN and _MAX
Date
Msg-id 550DF5A4.40509@2ndquadrant.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to INT64_MIN and _MAX  (Andrew Gierth <andrew@tao11.riddles.org.uk>)
Responses Re: INT64_MIN and _MAX  (Andrew Gierth <andrew@tao11.riddles.org.uk>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 21/03/15 23:45, Andrew Gierth wrote:
> A couple of places (adt/timestamp.c and pgbench.c) have this:
>
> #ifndef INT64_MAX
> #define INT64_MAX    INT64CONST(0x7FFFFFFFFFFFFFFF)
> #endif
>
> #ifndef INT64_MIN
> #define INT64_MIN    (-INT64CONST(0x7FFFFFFFFFFFFFFF) - 1)
> #endif
>
> On the other hand, int8.c uses the INT64_MIN expression directly inline.
>
> On the third hand, INT64_MIN etc. would typically be defined in stdint.h
> if it exists.
>
> So wouldn't it make more sense to move these definitions into c.h and
> standardize their usage?
>

I was thinking the same when I've seen Peter's version of Numeric 
abbreviations patch. So +1 for that.

--  Petr Jelinek                  http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training &
Services



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andrew Gierth
Date:
Subject: INT64_MIN and _MAX
Next
From: Andrew Gierth
Date:
Subject: Re: INT64_MIN and _MAX