On 03/18/2015 11:59 PM, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
> Okay. Attached revision has a few tweaks that reflect the status of
> int128/uint128 as specialized types that are basically only useful for
> this optimization, or other similar optimizations on compilers that
> either are GCC, or aim to be compatible with it. I don't think
> Andreas' V9 reflected that sufficiently.
>
> Also, I now always use PolyNumAggState (the typedef), even for #define
> HAVE_INT128 code, which I think is a bit clearer. Note that I have
> generated a minimal diff, without the machine generated changes that
> are ordinarily included in the final commit when autoconf tests are
> added, mostly because I do not have the exact version of autoconf on
> my development machine required to do this without creating irrelevant
Thanks,
I have attached a patch where I have ran autoconf.
--
Andreas Karlsson
