On 3/12/15 10:07 AM, Andres Freund wrote:
> I actually wonder if it'd not make more sense to define it as the
> physical column number. That'd reduce the invasiveness and risk of the
> patch considerably.
Clearly, the number of places where attnum has to be changed to
something else is not zero, and so it doesn't matter if a lot or a few
have to be changed. They all have to be looked at and considered.
