Re: Statement-level triggers and inheritance - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Greg Sabino Mullane
Subject Re: Statement-level triggers and inheritance
Date
Msg-id 54dd95a72f5ee7189fb1333879a7c1ba@biglumber.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Statement-level triggers and inheritance  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: RIPEMD160


> You're not making a lot of sense here, because INSERT always affects
> exactly the named table.  It's UPDATE and DELETE where the behavior
> is debatable.

*blink* Ah, right you are, had a typo in my testing script. Excellent
news, I'm now officially okay with either solution then. Thanks!

- --
Greg Sabino Mullane greg@turnstep.com
End Point Corporation
PGP Key: 0x14964AC8 200812011431
http://biglumber.com/x/web?pk=2529DF6AB8F79407E94445B4BC9B906714964AC8
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iEYEAREDAAYFAkk0O5YACgkQvJuQZxSWSsg20QCcCyWXQiIb8AwBJ0DixdJHXce5
2IAAoN1lNij5Oqz0ay4kDnvyJ72xVheR
=sW9/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Robert Haas"
Date:
Subject: Re: New to_timestamp implementation is pretty strict
Next
From: Emmanuel Cecchet
Date:
Subject: Re: Transactions and temp tables