Re: object description for FDW user mappings - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Amit Langote
Subject Re: object description for FDW user mappings
Date
Msg-id 54F8F335.2010403@lab.ntt.co.jp
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: object description for FDW user mappings  (Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 06-03-2015 AM 09:18, Amit Langote wrote:
> On 06-03-2015 AM 01:32, Tom Lane wrote:

>> +1 for the concept, but to be nitpicky, "in" doesn't seem like the right
>> word here.  "on server" would read better to me; or perhaps "at server".
>>
> 
> One more option may be "for server" (reading the doc for CREATE USER MAPPING)

Oh, I see it's been done that way already.

Thanks,
Amit




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Amit Langote
Date:
Subject: Re: object description for FDW user mappings
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Rethinking pg_dump's function sorting code