Re: 9.0.15 WAL mis-replay status? - Mailing list pgsql-admin

From Ray Stell
Subject Re: 9.0.15 WAL mis-replay status?
Date
Msg-id 5484E2AE-F298-470B-9412-05D9EEFEAE7F@vt.edu
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: 9.0.15 WAL mis-replay status?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: 9.0.15 WAL mis-replay status?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-admin
On Apr 28, 2014, at 11:07 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:

> Ray Stell <stellr@vt.edu> writes:
>>
>> Fix possible mis-replay of WAL records when some segments of a relation aren't full size (Greg Stark, Tom Lane)
> ..
> Note however that the issue could only arise on tables that exceed 1GB

I assume this is true also for other relkinds?  I have >1G indexes here, but tables are <1G.  TIA.

Attachment

pgsql-admin by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: 9.0.15 WAL mis-replay status?
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: 9.0.15 WAL mis-replay status?