Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> Wrong --- if you need a recompile then it's not binary-compatible, so
>> it should be a major version bump.
> But the previous poster said only API changes were reasons to bump the
> major, right?
Yes. He meant *binary* API changes, though, ie, anything that would
break extant executables originally linked to the prior version of the
shared library.
regards, tom lane
