Re: Stating the significance of Lehman & Yao in the nbtree README - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Heikki Linnakangas
Subject Re: Stating the significance of Lehman & Yao in the nbtree README
Date
Msg-id 54731BAB.3070200@vmware.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Stating the significance of Lehman & Yao in the nbtree README  (Peter Geoghegan <pg@heroku.com>)
Responses Re: Stating the significance of Lehman & Yao in the nbtree README
List pgsql-hackers
On 09/27/2014 09:36 AM, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 11:34 PM, Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I have observed that this patch is in 'Needs Review' state for
>> next CF.  Do you expect any further review from myside?  I think
>> we can use text recommended by Heikki and after that if you
>> feel something more is still required, then you can update the same
>> and send an updated patch.  I believe it should be in 'Waiting On Author'
>> state, please do let me know if you feel otherwise.
>
> I don't think so. Thanks for the review!

Ok, applied those extra paragraphs now, and marked as "committed" in the 
commitfest.

- Heikki




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Jirayut Nimsaeng
Date:
Subject: Re: BDR duplicate key value violates unique constraint error
Next
From: Kouhei Kaigai
Date:
Subject: Re: [v9.5] Custom Plan API