shihao zhong <zhong950419@gmail.com> writes:
> This may needs a catversion bump and backport to 14.
> The older version requires manual drop and recreate the view.
In principle we don't need a catversion bump here, since there's
no C-code-versus-catalogs compatibility issue. But we have usually
done one for information_schema changes.
I think I'd vote against back-patching. The fact that this went
unnoticed for 14 years demonstrates what low impact it has.
I don't foresee people wanting to manually replace that view in
order to fix it in existing installations.
regards, tom lane
