Hi Furuya-san,
(2014/11/07 16:54), furuyao@pm.nttdata.co.jp wrote:
>> (2014/08/28 18:00), Etsuro Fujita wrote:
>>> (2014/08/22 11:51), Noah Misch wrote:
>>>> Today's ANALYZE VERBOSE messaging for former inheritance parents
>>>> (tables with relhassubclass = true but no pg_inherits.inhparent
>>>> links) is deceptive, and I welcome a fix to omit the spurious
>>>> message. As defects go, this is quite minor. There's fundamentally
>>>> no value in collecting inheritance tree statistics for such a parent,
>>>> and no PostgreSQL command will do so.
>>
>>>> A
>>>> credible alternative is to emit a second message indicating that we
>>>> skipped the inheritance tree statistics after all, and why we skipped
>>>> them.
>>
>>> I'd like to address this by emitting the second message as shown below:
>>
>>> A separate patch (analyze.patch) handles the former case in a similar
>> way.
>>
>> I'll add to the upcoming CF, the analyze.patch as an independent item,
>> which emits a second message indicating that we skipped the inheritance
>> tree statistics and why we skipped them.
>
> I did a review of the patch.
> There was no problem.
> I confirmed the following.
>
> 1. applied cleanly and compilation was without warnings and errors
> 2. all regress tests was passed ok
> 3. The message output from ANALYZE VERBOSE.
>
> Following are the SQL which I used to check messages.
>
> create table parent (id serial);
> create table child (name text) inherits (parent);
> ANALYZE VERBOSE parent ;
> drop table child ;
> ANALYZE VERBOSE parent ;
I think that that is a correct test for this patch.
Thanks for the review!
Best regards,
Etsuro Fujita