On 11/04/2014 07:33 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> More generally, it seems like a grab bag of not terribly well designed
> features, and the features that do seem well designed seem like they
> ought to be more generic than just for int4 arrays. So to me it feels
> like proof-of-concept experimentation rather than a production-grade
> thing that we could feel good about moving into core.
Yah, as a user of intarray, I think it belongs as an external extension.Heck, I think it might get more attention as an
externalextension, and
if it were external then folks could fork it and create versions that
don't have operator conflicts.
--
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://pgexperts.com
