Re: Let's drop two obsolete features which are bear-traps for novices - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Josh Berkus
Subject Re: Let's drop two obsolete features which are bear-traps for novices
Date
Msg-id 545515CB.6000609@agliodbs.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Let's drop two obsolete features which are bear-traps for novices  (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>)
Responses Re: Let's drop two obsolete features which are bear-traps for novices  (Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com>)
Re: Let's drop two obsolete features which are bear-traps for novices  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 10/31/2014 03:07 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> I don't care one way or the other about the money type, but I will defend
> hash indexes, especially seeing that we've already added a pretty
> in-your-face warning as of 9.5:
> 
> regression=# create table foo(f1 int);
> CREATE TABLE
> regression=# create index on foo using hash (f1);
> WARNING:  hash indexes are not WAL-logged and their use is discouraged
> CREATE INDEX

Yes, and I'm arguing that is the wrong decision.  If hash indexes are
"discouraged", then they shouldn't be in core in the first place.

-- 
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://pgexperts.com



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: _mdfd_getseg can be expensive
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [BUGS] ltree::text not immutable?