Re: REINDEX CONCURRENTLY 2.0 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Jim Nasby
Subject Re: REINDEX CONCURRENTLY 2.0
Date
Msg-id 5452B170.8030801@BlueTreble.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: REINDEX CONCURRENTLY 2.0  (Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 10/30/14, 3:19 AM, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 7:59 AM, Jim Nasby <Jim.Nasby@bluetreble.com <mailto:Jim.Nasby@bluetreble.com>> wrote:
>  > Patch applies against current HEAD and builds, but I'm getting 37 failed
>  > tests (mostly parallel, but also misc and WITH; results attached). Is that
>  > expected?
> This is caused by the recent commit 7b1c2a0 (that I actually participated in reviewing :p) because of a missing
inclusionof ruleutils.h in index.c.
 

Sorry, forgot to mention patch now passes make check cleanly.
-- 
Jim Nasby, Data Architect, Blue Treble Consulting
Data in Trouble? Get it in Treble! http://BlueTreble.com



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Jim Nasby
Date:
Subject: Re: REINDEX CONCURRENTLY 2.0
Next
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: Re: TAP test breakage on MacOS X