Re: [PATCH] document - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: [PATCH] document
Date
Msg-id 543620.1629899413@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [PATCH] document  (Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com> writes:
> When I applied the patch to the master, I found that the table entries for
> those function were added into the table for aclitem functions in the docs.
> I think this is not valid position and needs to be moved to the proper one
> (maybe the table for system catalog information functions?).

You have to be very careful these days when applying stale patches to
func.sgml --- there's enough duplicate boilerplate that "patch' can easily
be fooled into dumping an addition into the wrong place.  I doubt that
the submitter meant the doc addition to go there.

            regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: Remove Value node struct
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: prevent immature WAL streaming