On 09/23/2014 09:55 AM, Lussier, Denis wrote:
> Wow... really glad Tom chimed in on this. I've been promoting/using
> PG as an enterprise-class database for over a decade and I was
> struggling with the "fact" that the server doesn't iterate thru a cursor
> without bringing it all into memory.
Well, that assertion would've failed the common-sense sanity test anyway.
You can `SELECT * FROM my_100GB_table` on a machine with 1GB of RAM.
Clearly this is impossible if Pg must marshal all the results into RAM
first.
I think John's misapprehension probably stemmed from the fact that libpq
and many other clients *default* to fetching the whole result from the
server into RAM before reporting success to the caller. This makes it
*seem* like the server must marshal the whole result in memory, but it's
the client doing that, not the server.
--
Craig Ringer http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
