-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 10/02/2014 06:43 PM, Jan Wieck wrote:
> The real question is at what level of information, returned to the
> user, does this feature become user friendly?
>
> It is one thing to provide information of the kind of
>
> TAKE ACCECSS EXCLUSIVE LOCK ON TABLE foo TEST EVERY ROW IN TABLE
> foo FOR FK (a, b) IN bar (id1, id2)
>
> That information is useful, but only to an experienced DBA who
> knows their schema and data to a certain degree. The majority of
> users, I fear, will not be able to even remotely guesstimate if
> that will need seconds or hours.
>
> There needs to be more detail information for those cases and I
> believe that tackling them one at a time in depth will lead to more
> useful results than trying to cover a lot but shallow.
Perhaps.
This and other posts on this thread make me wonder if some kind of
extension to the stats collector and pg_stat_statement might be a good
place to start?
Joe
- --
Joe Conway
credativ LLC: http://www.credativ.us
Linux, PostgreSQL, and general Open Source
Training, Service, Consulting, & 24x7 Support
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1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=0lXI
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
