Re: INSERT ... ON CONFLICT {UPDATE | IGNORE} - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Josh Berkus
Subject Re: INSERT ... ON CONFLICT {UPDATE | IGNORE}
Date
Msg-id 542AFB31.6000600@agliodbs.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to INSERT ... ON CONFLICT {UPDATE | IGNORE}  (Peter Geoghegan <pg@heroku.com>)
Responses Re: INSERT ... ON CONFLICT {UPDATE | IGNORE}
Re: INSERT ... ON CONFLICT {UPDATE | IGNORE}
List pgsql-hackers
On 09/30/2014 11:20 AM, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
>> > For example, this patch for UPSERT doesn't support updatable views.
>> > But I can't see anyone that didn't read the patch would know that.
> By reading the CREATE VIEW docs. Maybe there could stand to be a
> compatibility note in the main INSERT command, but I didn't want to do
> that as long as things were up in the air. It might be the case that
> we figure out good behavior for updatable views.

All of these things sound like good ideas for documentation
improvements, but hardly anything which should block the patch.  It has
documentation, more than we'd require for a lot of other patches, and
it's not like the 9.5 release is next month.

-- 
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://pgexperts.com



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Dean Rasheed
Date:
Subject: Re: WITH CHECK and Column-Level Privileges
Next
From: searcher s
Date:
Subject: Full_page_write is off in backup mode