On 09/29/2014 04:14 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes:
>> On 09/29/2014 03:23 PM, Pavel Stehule wrote:
>>> It is better than nothing, but it is not nice for JSON due 2x parsing.
>> JSON parsing is actually pretty darn fast. Every json (as opposed to
>> jsonb) function reparses the json. It's true that this is not nearly as
>> fast as processing jsonb, but I think for this purpose it's probably not
>> too bad.
> More to the point, the way to fix any concerns about double parsing is to
> create row_to_jsonb(), not to plaster a bunch of options on row_to_json().
row_to_jsonb would be completely redundant with to_jsonb() in my recent
patch.
And I don't want to add options like this there for the same reasons I
didn't want them in row_to_json().
cheers
andrew
