On 09/27/2014 05:12 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas@vmware.com> writes:
>> [ unreviewed patches ]
>
>> Grouping Sets
>
>> There has been a lot of discussion, but no decisions. See
>> http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/87vbodhtvb.fsf@news-spur.riddles.org.uk.
>
>> Would a committer be interested to take responsibility of this? If not,
>> this will just linger indefinitely.
>
> I should and will take this, but not in this commitfest: I've been just
> horribly busy lately with both work and personal issues. If we can punt
> it to the next fest, I will promise to work on it then.
Ok, thanks! I moved this to next commitfest and put your name on it as
reviewer.
>> INNER JOIN removals
>
>> The latest patch is significantly different from what was originally
>> submitted for the commitfest, so I wouldn't feel bad just bumping this
>> to the next one. I'll do that unless someone picks this up soon.
>> Tom: I know you're busy with the more urgent jsonb patch.. Do you think
>> you would find the time to review this anytime soon? Anyone else?
>
> Same deal here.
I marked this as "Returned with feedback", as the trigger-queue issue
seems like a show-stopper.
>> Selectivity estimation for inet operators
>
>> I think there's a bug in the estimation of semi-joins, see
>> http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/5423DC8D.3080206@vmware.com. But I
>> think we could split this patch into two, and commit the non-join
>> selectivity estimator first, as that seems OK. If no-one else steps up
>> to the plate, I can do that..
>
> And I'd like to look this one over too ...
Ok, punted this to next commitfest too.
- Heikki
