Re: "Core" function in Postgres - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Gregory Smith
Subject Re: "Core" function in Postgres
Date
Msg-id 54221AC3.5010208@gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: "Core" function in Postgres  (Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 9/23/14, 8:02 PM, Michael Paquier wrote:
> pgsql-hackers is as well a mailing list where people have technical 
> discussions about features and patches, hence your question would be 
> more adapted for pgsql-novice or pgsql-general.

Let's be fair and get the details perfect if we're going to advise 
people on list policy, and that's not quite right if you compare against 
http://www.postgresql.org/list/

The official description says you consider trying elsewhere first, and " 
If your question cannot be answered by people in the other lists, and it 
is likely that only a developer will know the answer, you may re-post 
your question in this list".
From that, it's completely reasonable that Mingzhe guessed how main() 
is used in PostgreSQL is something only a developer would know the 
answer to, and therefore should go here instead of pgsql-general.

My feedback would be to point out that that pgsql-general is also a list 
where " many of the developers monitor" traffic, and that's the right 
place to post first for this sort of question.  The mailing list page 
does not make that completely obvious though, so this is an 
understandable thing to be unsure about.  This is definitely not a 
pgsql-novice question.

The mailing list page could probably use an explicit clarification that 
pgsql-general *is* an appropriate venue for simpler questions "that only 
a developer will know the answer".

-- 
Greg Smith greg.smith@crunchydatasolutions.com
Chief PostgreSQL Evangelist - http://crunchydatasolutions.com/



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: jsonb format is pessimal for toast compression
Next
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: BRIN indexes - TRAP: BadArgument