Re: execl() sentinel - Mailing list pgsql-patches

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: execl() sentinel
Date
Msg-id 5422.1184730017@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: execl() sentinel  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
Responses Re: execl() sentinel
List pgsql-patches
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes:
> Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>> pg_regress.c: In function `spawn_process':
>> pg_regress.c:914: warning: missing sentinel in function call

> You can apply this, but it sure seems like a compiler/include file bug
> to me, even with the 64-bit explaination.

There are lots of platforms where the include files and the compiler are
not all that compatible, gcc + vendor include files being the prototype
case.  It's too bad that gcc doesn't have a
-Wno-snarkiness-about-system-headers-thank-you switch.

            regards, tom lane

pgsql-patches by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: docfix - DELETE doesn't affect auto-analyze
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: docfix - DELETE doesn't affect auto-analyze