On 09/16/2014 10:09 AM, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> On 09/16/2014 10:57 AM, Craig Ringer wrote:
>> On 09/16/2014 03:15 PM, Pavel Stehule wrote:
>>
>>> Why we don't introduce a temporary functions instead?
>>
>> I think that'd be a lot cleaner and simpler. It's something I've
>> frequently wanted, and as Hekki points out it's already possible by
>> creating the function in pg_temp, there just isn't the syntax sugar for
>> "CREATE TEMPORARY FUNCTION".
>>
>> So why not just add "CREATE TEMPORARY FUNCTION"?
>
> Sure, why not.
Because you still have to do
SELECT pg_temp.my_temp_function(blah);
to execute it.
>> It means two steps:
>>
>> CREATE TEMPORARY FUNCTION ... $$ $$;
>>
>> SELECT my_temp_function(blah);
That won't work; see above.
--
Vik
