Re: Collations and Replication; Next Steps - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: Collations and Replication; Next Steps
Date
Msg-id 5419CE22.8030603@gmx.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Collations and Replication; Next Steps  (Matthew Kelly <mkelly@tripadvisor.com>)
Responses Re: Collations and Replication; Next Steps
List pgsql-hackers
On 9/17/14 9:07 AM, Matthew Kelly wrote:
> Here is where I think the timezone and PostGIS cases are fundamentally different:
> I can pretty easily make sure that all my servers run in the same timezone.  That's just good practice.  I'm also
goingto install the same version of PostGIS everywhere in a cluster.  I'll build PostGIS and its dependencies from the
exactsame source files, regardless of when I build the machine.
 

I wrote time zone *database*, not time zone.  The time zone database  is
(in some configurations) part of glibc.

I also wrote PostGIS dependent libraries, not PostGIS itself.  If you
are comparing RHEL 5 and 6, as you wrote elsewhere, then some of those
will most likely be different.  (Heck, glibc could be different.  Is
glibc never allowed to fix insufficiencies in its floating-point
implementation, for example?)

Also, there is nothing that guarantees that the PostGIS version will be
the same on both sides.



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Martijn van Oosterhout
Date:
Subject: Re: Collations and Replication; Next Steps
Next
From: Peter Geoghegan
Date:
Subject: Re: Collations and Replication; Next Steps