(2014/08/15 6:18), Rukh Meski wrote:
> Based on the feedback on my previous patch, I've separated only the
> LIMIT part into its own feature. This version plays nicely with
> inheritance. The intended use is splitting up big UPDATEs and DELETEs
> into batches more easily and efficiently.
IIUC, the patch doesn't support OFFSET with UPDATE/DELETE ... LIMIT. Is
that OK? When we support ORDER BY ... LIMIT/OFFSET, we will also be
allowing for OFFSET with UPDATE/DELETE ... LIMIT. So, ISTM it would be
better for the patch to support OFFSET at this point. No?
Thanks,
Best regards,
Etsuro Fujita
