On 09/16/2014 03:15 PM, Pavel Stehule wrote:
> Why we don't introduce a temporary functions instead?
I think that'd be a lot cleaner and simpler. It's something I've
frequently wanted, and as Hekki points out it's already possible by
creating the function in pg_temp, there just isn't the syntax sugar for
"CREATE TEMPORARY FUNCTION".
So why not just add "CREATE TEMPORARY FUNCTION"?
It means two steps:
CREATE TEMPORARY FUNCTION ... $$ $$;
SELECT my_temp_function(blah);
but I'm not personally convinced that a parameterised DO block is much
easier, and the idea just rings wrong to me.
I agree with Pavel that the natural way to parameterise DO blocks, down
the track, will be to allow them to get (and set?) SQL-typed session
variables. Of course, we'd need to support them first ;-)
-- Craig Ringer http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
