Re: Trigger transaction isolation - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Trigger transaction isolation
Date
Msg-id 54137.1598972521@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Trigger transaction isolation  (Adrian Klaver <adrian.klaver@aklaver.com>)
Responses Re: Trigger transaction isolation  (Dirk Lattermann <dlatt@alqualonde.de>)
List pgsql-general
Adrian Klaver <adrian.klaver@aklaver.com> writes:
> As I understand it a trigger function runs in its own transaction so the 
> rules from below apply:
> https://www.postgresql.org/docs/12/transaction-iso.html

No, a trigger is part of the calling transaction.  There's nothing special
about it other than the condition causing the call; visibility rules are
the same as for any other function.  So the answer to the OP's question
depends on the transaction's isolation level and (for typical
PLs) on whether the function is VOLATILE or not.

serializable -> the transaction's initial snapshot is used throughout

non serializable, volatile function -> each statement in the function
takes a fresh snapshot

non serializable, non-volatile function -> the function uses a single
snapshot.  For a non-deferred trigger, I think it shares the snapshot
used by the triggering query.  Not sure about exactly when the snapshot
is taken for a deferred trigger.

            regards, tom lane



pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Adrian Klaver
Date:
Subject: Re: Trigger transaction isolation
Next
From: Michael Lewis
Date:
Subject: Re: How bad is using queries with thousands of values for operators IN or ANY?