Re: VF0072 - Operating System Compatibility for Application PostgreSQL 8.3 - Mailing list pgsql-sql
From | Craig Ringer |
---|---|
Subject | Re: VF0072 - Operating System Compatibility for Application PostgreSQL 8.3 |
Date | |
Msg-id | 54131779.1040401@2ndquadrant.com Whole thread Raw |
In response to | VF0072 - Operating System Compatibility for Application PostgreSQL 8.3 (Bijayalakshmi Swain <bijayas@microsoft.com>) |
List | pgsql-sql |
On 09/08/2014 04:48 PM, Bijayalakshmi Swain wrote: > As part of planning an operating system upgrade for our customer Which customer? Specifics would be helpful. > we are > researching the OS supportability status of one or more of your > company’s applications. Unfortunately, we could not locate this > information on your website. In order to help our joint customer I was unaware that PostgreSQL.org had customers, as such. It'd be useful to have specifics on what exactly you mean. > make > the most informed decision regarding the supportability of your > application in their enterprise, we request your assistance in providing > support information on your application as per the details below. It would be much more constructive to send things like this as a link to a web form that can be simply filled, rather than a long-form email with no really useful way to enter responses. Though I really think it'd be more appropriate to seek out an authoritative answer from key people in the project rather than asking the mailing list. If you have specific concerns about compatibility with a particular PostgreSQL release and Windows release, please raise them here, with specifics. The distinction between "supported" and "compatible" that you draw in your mail is largely a false one for PostgreSQL. Supported by whom? The support provided on -general and -hackers is by the community, for the community, and is covered in the version policy: http://www.postgresql.org/support/versioning/ Different commercial support providers have different policies about what they support for their customers; you'd need to engage with them separately. I would summarise the *compatibility* matrix, such as it is, with something like: The community-supported PostgreSQL 8.4 release and newer releases are compatible with Windows XP / Server 2003 and above. Native x64 builds are provided from PostgreSQL 9.0 onward, where they're expected to be compatible with Windows XP x64, but generally only really used or tested on Windows 7 / Server 2008 and above. In practice some significant fixes to shared memory handling in 9.0 make that release and newer preferred options for Windows-based deployments. The obsolete and unsupported PostgreSQL 8.3 release also works on Windows XP / 2003. I haven't personally noticed any prominent complaints about it on Windows 7 or Windows 8, but do not pay close attention to reports about issues with old PostgreSQL releases on new operating system releases. 8.3 is no longer automatically tested by the buildfarm, so issues with new Windows releases will only get noticed if someone cares enough to complain. The best thing that you could do to provide more information about compatibility would be to arrange for the donation of access to machines for use as build-farm members for automated testing of PostgreSQL on a wider variety of Windows platforms, as coverage is currently incomplete: http://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_members.pl Further information about compatibility can be found in the documentation: http://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/static/supported-platforms.html the about page: http://www.postgresql.org/about/ the version policy: http://www.postgresql.org/support/versioning/ the buildfarm: http://buildfarm.postgresql.org/ and the list of commercial support providers: http://www.postgresql.org/support/professional_support/ -- Craig Ringer http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services