On 11.9.2014 21:14, Petr Jelinek wrote:
> On 11/09/14 18:59, Tomas Vondra wrote:
>> On 10.9.2014 22:39, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
>>> The bad news is that the rest don't seem to moving graduating from the
>>> Needs Review state.
>>
>> ISTM that many patches
>>
>> (b) in 'waiting on author' are not really waiting, because the author
>> already responded / posted a new version of the patch
>>
>> Except that the patch status was not updated, whis makes it really
>> difficult to spot patches that currently need a review :-(
>>
>
> I think that still means patch is 'waiting for author' as author is
> responsible for changing this.
In that case it was meant as a plea to the authors to update this ;-)
Tomas
