On 07/09/14 21:09, Andres Freund wrote:
> On 2014-09-07 15:05:35 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> I think the main remaining issue is that we don't have consensus on
>> the function name AFAICT. I'm okay with using width_bucket(), as
>> is done in the latest patch, but there were objections ...
>
> Just reread that part of the thread and personally I disliked all the
> other suggested names more than width_bucket.
>
Same here, that's why I didn't change it.
-- Petr Jelinek http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training &
Services
