On 09/04/2014 09:31 AM, Pavel Stehule wrote:
> 2014-09-04 15:24 GMT+02:00 Jan Wieck <jan@wi3ck.info
>
> I think I like the COMMAND CONSTRAINT the best so far.
>
>
> I not, because when it will not be part of SQL, than parser in plpgsql
> will be more complex. You have to inject SELECT, UPDATE, INSERT, DELETE
Making the COMMAND CONSTRAINT part of the core SQL parser was how I
understood Hannu's idea. It would be horrible to tuck that feature away
inside of a PL, rather than making it available to all PLs as well as
applications, that use SQL directly (I think there still are two or
three applications that do).
Regards,
Jan
--
Jan Wieck
Senior Software Engineer
http://slony.info
