On 09/01/2014 02:04 AM, Joel Jacobson wrote:
> Please share your wish list of things you would want in plpgsql2 which
> are not possible to implement in plpgsql because they could possibly
> break compatibility.
Well, if I were designing a new procedural SQL extension language, I
wouldn't base it on the bastard child of ADA and SQL89. I would come up
with something new. One of the critical features such a new language
would have would be the ability to dynamically generate queries
*without* using string manipulation and EXECUTE.
Otherwise, improvements to PL/pgSQL amount to the proverbial porcine
makeover.
--
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://pgexperts.com
