Re: PL/pgSQL 2 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Joshua D. Drake
Subject Re: PL/pgSQL 2
Date
Msg-id 54062D2C.6090303@commandprompt.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: PL/pgSQL 2  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
Responses Re: PL/pgSQL 2
List pgsql-hackers
On 09/02/2014 09:48 AM, Bruce Momjian wrote:

>> As a case in point, EDB have spent quite a few man-years on their Oracle
>> compatibility layer; and it's still not a terribly exact match, according
>> to my colleagues who have looked at it.  So that is a tarbaby I don't
>> personally care to touch ... even ignoring the fact that cutting off
>> EDB's air supply wouldn't be a good thing for the community to do.

What any commercial entity and the Community do are mutually exclusive 
and we can not and should not determine what features we will support 
based on any commercial endeavor.

JD


-- 
Command Prompt, Inc. - http://www.commandprompt.com/  503-667-4564
PostgreSQL Support, Training, Professional Services and Development
High Availability, Oracle Conversion, @cmdpromptinc
"If we send our children to Caesar for their education, we should             not be surprised when they come back as
Romans."



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Geoghegan
Date:
Subject: Re: B-Tree support function number 3 (strxfrm() optimization)
Next
From: Jan Wieck
Date:
Subject: Re: PL/pgSQL 2