Re: PL/pgSQL 2 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Álvaro Hernández Tortosa
Subject Re: PL/pgSQL 2
Date
Msg-id 54059362.30005@nosys.es
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: PL/pgSQL 2  (Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: PL/pgSQL 2  (Hannu Krosing <hannu@2ndQuadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers

On 02/09/14 11:44, Pavel Stehule wrote:





    For 9.4, we have the media already saying "Postgres has NoSQL capabilities" (which is only partially true). For x.y we could have the media saying "Postgres adds Oracle compatibility" (which would be only partially true). But that brings a lot of users to postgres, and that helps us all.

Partial true can enforce so lot of people will hate postgres too. False promises are wrong

    Then let's stop talking about postgres being NoSQL. NoSQL is basically "schema-less" (really bad name) plus "infinite scalability" (which basically means transparent sharding). We fail to provide the latter very clearly...

    Álvaro

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Pavel Stehule
Date:
Subject: Re: PL/pgSQL 2
Next
From: Etsuro Fujita
Date:
Subject: Re: postgres_fdw behaves oddly