Re: VACUUM unable to accomplish because of a non-existent MultiXactId - Mailing list pgsql-admin

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: VACUUM unable to accomplish because of a non-existent MultiXactId
Date
Msg-id 5403.1448652828@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: VACUUM unable to accomplish because of a non-existent MultiXactId  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>)
Responses Re: VACUUM unable to accomplish because of a non-existent MultiXactId  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-admin
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> Kouber Saparev wrote:
>> Recently I spotted an auto vacuum that is constantly being run over a pg_toast table in the database. Interestingly
theunderlying table did not have that amount of writes that would trigger the auto vacuum every minute. 
>>
>> When I tried to run the VACUUM manually it died with a non-existent MultiXactId error:
>>
>> db=# vacuum analyze verbose pg_toast.pg_toast_376621;
>> INFO:  vacuuming "pg_toast.pg_toast_376621"
>> ERROR:  MultiXactId 2915905228 does no longer exist -- apparent wraparound

> Hmm, I don't think there can be multixacts in toast tables at all,
> normally.

Couldn't creation and deletion of a toasted object within the same
transaction do it?

            regards, tom lane


pgsql-admin by date:

Previous
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: VACUUM unable to accomplish because of a non-existent MultiXactId
Next
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: VACUUM unable to accomplish because of a non-existent MultiXactId