(2014/08/06 20:43), Etsuro Fujita wrote:
>> (2014/06/30 22:48), Tom Lane wrote:
>>> I wonder whether it isn't time to change that. It was coded like that
>>> originally only because calculating the values would've been a waste of
>>> cycles at the time. But this is at least the third place where it'd be
>>> useful to have attr_needed for child rels.
> Attached is a WIP patch for that.
I've revised the patch.
Changes:
* Make the code more readable
* Revise the comments
* Cleanup
Please find attached an updated version of the patch.
Thanks,
Best regards,
Etsuro Fujita
