buildfarm and "rolling release" distros - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andrew Dunstan
Subject buildfarm and "rolling release" distros
Date
Msg-id 53B2E69A.9050701@dunslane.net
Whole thread Raw
Responses Re: buildfarm and "rolling release" distros  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
I've always been a bit reluctant to accept buildfarm members that are 
constantly being updated, because it seemed to me that it created 
something with too many variables. However, we occasionally get requests 
from people who want to run on such platforms, and I'm also a bit 
reluctant to turn away willing volunteers. We have one such application 
now in hand.

What do people think about this. Is it valuable to have? Do we have 
enough stability from the buildfarm members that are not auto-updated 
that we can accept a certain number of auto-updating members, where, if 
something breaks, and it doesn't break elsewhere, then we suspect that 
something that got upgraded broke the build?

I'm also not sure how to designate these machines. The buildfarm server 
metadata isn't designed for auto-updating build platforms. But no doubt 
if necessary we can come up with something.

cheers

andrew



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Sawada Masahiko
Date:
Subject: Re: TODO : Allow parallel cores to be used by vacuumdb [ WIP ]
Next
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: Spinlocks and compiler/memory barriers