Re: Wal archive way behind in streaming replication - Mailing list pgsql-admin

From John Scalia
Subject Re: Wal archive way behind in streaming replication
Date
Msg-id 53AC4EEC.2000803@gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Wal archive way behind in streaming replication  (Andrew Krause <andrew.krause@breakthroughfuel.com>)
Responses Re: Wal archive way behind in streaming replication
List pgsql-admin
OK, starting over...

I killed off both standby servers and I rebuilt my databases off of the primary server (10.10.1.128) using:

pg_basebackup -h 10.10.1.128 -p 5432 -D /var/lib/pgsql/9.3/data -X s -c fast

It took about 40 minutes to complete for each standby. Immediately after it completed, I copied my previously saved
recovery.conffile into each's data directory and started the  
standby servers. I did not do anything to the files in the directory specified by the restore_command. Now, I would
expectthe primary to continue writing WAL segments into the  
directory while the pg_basebackup is running, but it apparently did not. Checking the primary's pg_xlog directory
showedthat it was now writing *DF, and each standby had only  
received up to *D5. That means each standby's WALs are about 1 hour behind. I would expect each to be at *DE as that
shouldbe the last completely written WAL file, and I would  
guess that the primary is still writing *DF.

The archive process on the primary is now writing WAL segments to the directory in archive_command, as I just saw *D6
popinto it, but it's never going to catch up without help as  
it's only copying 1 file every 10 minutes as a new one gets generated. Am I missing a flag for pg_basebackup? Or should
Ijust accept that the standby's could never catch up with  
WAL segments and just turn archiving off?
--
Jay


pgsql-admin by date:

Previous
From: Matheus de Oliveira
Date:
Subject: Re: Pg_basebackup does not do aything
Next
From: John Scalia
Date:
Subject: Re: Pg_basebackup does not do aything