Re: GSoC on WAL-logging hash indexes - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Vik Fearing
Subject Re: GSoC on WAL-logging hash indexes
Date
Msg-id 53A2B01D.3000806@dalibo.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: GSoC on WAL-logging hash indexes  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: GSoC on WAL-logging hash indexes  (Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 04/30/2014 11:41 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> We really oughta fix the WAL situation, not just band-aid around it.

After re-reading this thread, it is not clear that anyone is going to
work on it so I'll just ask:

Is anyone working on this?

If not, I'd like to put it on my plate.

-- 
Vik




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Abhijit Menon-Sen
Date:
Subject: Re: idle_in_transaction_timeout
Next
From: Vik Fearing
Date:
Subject: Re: Minmax indexes