On 06/15/2014 04:58 PM, Josh Berkus wrote:
> I've been poking at the various json-query syntaxes you forwarded, and
> none of them really work for the actual jsquery features. Also, the
> existing syntax has the advantage of being *simple*, relatively
> speaking, and reasonably similar to JSONPATH.
>
> In other words, what I'm saying is: I don't think there's an existing,
> poplular syntax we could reasonably use.
>
Not to mention the similarity to tsquery, which is something not to be
despised.
cheers
andrew
