Re: performance regression in 9.2/9.3 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Linos
Subject Re: performance regression in 9.2/9.3
Date
Msg-id 5395CC07.1000301@linos.es
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: performance regression in 9.2/9.3  (Merlin Moncure <mmoncure@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: performance regression in 9.2/9.3  (Merlin Moncure <mmoncure@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 09/06/14 16:55, Merlin Moncure wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 9:51 AM, Linos <info@linos.es> wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> Is this information enough? I could try to assemble a complete test case but I have very little time right now
becauseI am trying to meet a very difficult deadline.
 
>>
>> I will do ASAP if needed.
> It is not -- it was enough to diagnose a potential problem but not the
> solution.  Tom was pretty clear: "I'd like to see a self-contained
> test case, by which I mean full details about the table/view schemas;
> it's not clear whether the actual data is very important here.".
>
> merlin

Merlin, in the email I replied to are attached the table/view schemas, I was referring to this information as enough or
not.Tom said "full details about the table/view schemas"  and these details are attached to the original email I
repliedto.
 
Miguel Angel.



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Merlin Moncure
Date:
Subject: Re: performance regression in 9.2/9.3
Next
From: Kevin Grittner
Date:
Subject: Re: Inaccuracy in VACUUM's tuple count estimates