Re: Bison 3.0 updates - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Vik Fearing
Subject Re: Bison 3.0 updates
Date
Msg-id 537CDA22.9060105@dalibo.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Bison 3.0 updates  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Bison 3.0 updates
List pgsql-hackers
On 05/21/2014 12:29 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Vik Fearing <vik.fearing@dalibo.com> writes:
>> I'm getting some more of these, including some I thought you had fixed.
>> Bison 3.0.2 on current head.
> I didn't do anything to suppress those warnings:
>
>> gram.y:172.1-13: warning: deprecated directive, use ‘%name-prefix’
>> [-Wdeprecated]
>>  %name-prefix="base_yy"
>>  ^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> because it's hard to see how that's anything but a bison bug.

The wording is a little odd as it seems we're supposed to replace
%name-prefix with... %name-prefix, but the docs say we're supposed to
use api.prefix now instead.  I'll just take your word for it as I've
never done anything with bison before.

-- 
Vik




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Bison 3.0 updates
Next
From: Jeff Ross
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_upgrade fails: Mismatch of relation OID in database 8.4 -> 9.3