Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: vacuumdb --all --analyze-in-stages - wrong order? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: vacuumdb --all --analyze-in-stages - wrong order?
Date
Msg-id 537A449F.1020108@gmx.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to vacuumdb --all --analyze-in-stages - wrong order?  (Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: vacuumdb --all --analyze-in-stages - wrong order?
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
On 5/18/14, 3:52 AM, Pavel Stehule wrote:
> Hello
> 
> I am looking on --analyze-in-stages option. If I understand well,
> motivation for this option is a get some minimal statistic for databases
> in minimal time. But when I tested, I found so iterations are per
> databases, not per stages - some first database get a maximum statistics
> and second has zero statistics. Isn't it unpractical?

Yes.  Let me see if I can fix that.

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: buildfarm: strange OOM failures on markhor (running CLOBBER_CACHE_RECURSIVELY)
Next
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: uuid-ossp (Re: [pgsql-packagers] Postgresapp 9.4 beta build ready)