Re: Sending out a request for more buildfarm animals? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tomas Vondra
Subject Re: Sending out a request for more buildfarm animals?
Date
Msg-id 536C097C.1070707@fuzzy.cz
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Sending out a request for more buildfarm animals?  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
Responses Re: Sending out a request for more buildfarm animals?  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>)
Re: Sending out a request for more buildfarm animals?  (Tomas Vondra <tv@fuzzy.cz>)
Re: Sending out a request for more buildfarm animals?  (Tomas Vondra <tv@fuzzy.cz>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 8.5.2014 23:48, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> 
> On 05/08/2014 05:21 PM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>> Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>>
>>> I really don't get what your objection to the setup is. And no, I
>>> don't want them to run concurrently, I'd rather spread out the
>>> cycles.
>> I wasn't objecting, merely an observation. Note that Tomas
>> mentioned he's okay with running 4 builds at once. My main point
>> here, really, is that having a larger number of animals shouldn't
>> be an impediment for a more complex permutation of configurations,
>> if he's okay with doing that. I assume you wouldn't object to my
>> approving four extra animals running on the same machine, if Tomas
>> wants to go for that.

So, if I get this right, the proposal is to have 7 animals:


1) all branches/locales, frequent builds (every few hours) magpie  - gcc fulmar  - icc treepie - clang

2) single branch/locale, CLOBBER, built once a week magpie2 - gcc fulmar2 - icc treepie - clang

3) single branch/locale, recursive CLOBBER, built once a month


I don't particularly mind the number of animals, although I was shooting
for lower number.

The only question is - should we use 3 animals for the recursive CLOBBER
too? I mean, one for each compiler?

regards
Tomas



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: David G Johnston
Date:
Subject: Re: PQputCopyEnd doesn't adhere to its API contract
Next
From: Jim Nasby
Date:
Subject: Re: Issue with GRANT/COMMENT ON FUNCTION with default