"Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com> writes:
> Sorry Tom. Greg is correct here although I disagree with his wording. It
> should be removed and if someone passes -d it should throw an ERROR that
> says something like:
> ERROR: -d has been replaced by -I
Well, if you want to break it, we can debate about the wisdom of that.
But please don't describe the patch in such a misleading way as the
current thread title.
regards, tom lane
