Re: Perfomance degradation 9.3 (vs 9.2) for FreeBSD - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Jim Nasby
Subject Re: Perfomance degradation 9.3 (vs 9.2) for FreeBSD
Date
Msg-id 535C09EA.9060500@nasby.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Perfomance degradation 9.3 (vs 9.2) for FreeBSD  (Alfred Perlstein <alfred@freebsd.org>)
Responses Re: Perfomance degradation 9.3 (vs 9.2) for FreeBSD
List pgsql-hackers
On 4/22/14, 5:01 PM, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
>
> Hey folks, I just spoke with our director of netops Tom Sparks here at Norse and we have a vested interest in
Postgresql. We can throw together a cluster of 4 machines with specs approximately in the range of dual quad core
westmerewith ~64GB of ram running FreeBSD 10 or 11. We can also do an Ubungu install as well or other Linux distro.
Pleaselet me know if that this would be a something that the project could make use of please.
 
>
> We also have colo space and power, etc.  So this would be the whole deal.  The cluster would be up for as long as
needed.
>
> Are the machine specs sufficient?  Any other things we should look for?
>
> CC'd Tom on this email.

Did anyone respond to this off-list?

Would these machines be more useful as dedicated performance test servers for the community or generic BenchFarm
members?
-- 
Jim C. Nasby, Data Architect                       jim@nasby.net
512.569.9461 (cell)                         http://jim.nasby.net



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Jim Nasby
Date:
Subject: Re: How can we make beta testing better?
Next
From: Jim Nasby
Date:
Subject: Re: Decrease MAX_BACKENDS to 2^16