-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 04/24/2014 08:25 PM, Joe Conway wrote:
> Shouldn't the reference to work_mem here:
>
> "Allow in-memory sorts to use their full memory allocation (Jeff
> Janes)"
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.3/interactive/release-9-3.html#AEN114956
>
> actually be referencing maintenance_work_mem?
Or I suppose, rather, shouldn't it be referring to both?
Joe
- --
Joe Conway
credativ LLC: http://www.credativ.us
Linux, PostgreSQL, and general Open Source
Training, Service, Consulting, & 24x7 Support
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.14 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/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=hTeu
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
