Re: Re: default opclass for jsonb (was Re: Call for GIST/GIN/SP-GIST opclass documentation) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Petr Jelinek
Subject Re: Re: default opclass for jsonb (was Re: Call for GIST/GIN/SP-GIST opclass documentation)
Date
Msg-id 535777DA.3000203@2ndquadrant.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Re: default opclass for jsonb (was Re: Call for GIST/GIN/SP-GIST opclass documentation)  (Peter Geoghegan <pg@heroku.com>)
Responses Re: Re: default opclass for jsonb (was Re: Call for GIST/GIN/SP-GIST opclass documentation)  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 23/04/14 00:40, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 3:32 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote:
>> Where are we on the default JSONB opclass change?
>
> FWIW, I still don't have any strong opinion here. I defer to others on
> this question.
>

I vote for changing it, even though neither option is ideal I think that 
given the nature of datatype the current default will break inserts for 
common usage pattern and that's much worse than not being able to use 
the index for some operators.


--  Petr Jelinek                  http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training &
Services



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: Missing pfree in logical_heap_rewrite_flush_mappings()
Next
From: David Rowley
Date:
Subject: Re: 9.4 Proposal: Initdb creates a single table